Techniques in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Management
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 33-41 , January 2007

Interpreting clinical trials for analgesia

  • Craig T. Hartrick, MD, DABPM, FIPP

      Affiliations

    • Anesthesiology Research, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence: Craig T. Hartrick, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd., Royal Oak, MI 48304.
    • ,
  • Garen Manvelian, MD

      Affiliations

    • New River Pharmaceuticals, Blacksburg, Virginia.

References 

  1. International Conference on Harmonisation. Available at: http://www.ich.org/
  2. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. Available at: http://www.phrma.org
  3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Available at: http://www.icmje.org
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/
  5. Cummings SR, Browner WS, Hulley SB. Conceiving the research question. In:  Hulley SB,  Cummings SR editor. Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1988;p. 12–17
  6. Geha PY, Baliki MN, Chialvo DR, et al. Brain activity for spontaneous pain of postherpetic neuralgia and its modulation by lidocaine patch therapy. Pain. 2007;128:88–100
  7. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, et al. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17:45–56
  8. Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000;16:22–28
  9. Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?. Pain Pract. 2003;3:310–316
  10. Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, et al. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994;56:217–226
  11. Bernstein SL, Chang A, Esses D, et al. Relationship between intensity and relief in patients with acute, severe pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:158–159
  12. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, et al. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000;88:287–294
  13. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2002;96:410–411
  14. McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Postoperative analgesia and vomiting, with special reference to day-case surgery: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:17–21
  15. Collins SL, Moore A, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimeters?. Pain. 1997;72:95–97
  16. Hartrick CT, Kovan JP. Pain assessment following general anesthesia using the Toddler Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale: a comparative study. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:411–415
  17. Moore A, Moore O, McQuay H, et al. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales. Pain. 1997;69:311–315
  18. Gray A, Kehlet H, Bonnet F, et al. Predicting postoperative analgesia outcomes: NNT league tables or procedure-specific evidence?. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:710–714
  19. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113:9–19
  20. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby EA, et al. Pain assessment in patients with low back pain: comparison of weekly recall and momentary electronic data. J Pain. 2006;7:192–199
  21. Cahana A. Ethical and epistemological problems when applying evidence-based medicine to pain management. Pain Pract. 2005;5:298–302
  22. Koshi EB, Short CA. Placebo theory and its implications for research and clinical practice: a review of the recent literature. Pain Pract. 2007;7:4–20
  23. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT Statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reporting for parallel-group randomized trials. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285:1987–1991
  24. Kallai I, Barke A, Voss U. The effects of experimenter characteristics on pain reports in women and men. Pain. 2004;112:142–147
  25. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. I. The P value fallacy. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:995–1004
  26. Hartrick CT. Low back pain: best evidence—best tools. Pain Pract. 2005;5:151–152
  27. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. II. The Bayes factor. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:1005–1013
  28. Amanzio M, Benedetti F. Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific subsystems. J Neurosci. 1999;19:484–494
  29. Moerman , Daniel E. The meaning response: thinking about placebos. Pain Pract. 2006;6:233–236
  30. Farrar JT, Dworkin RH, Max MB. Use of the cumulative proportion of responders analysis graph to present pain data over a range of cut-off points: making clinical trial data more understandable. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006;31:369–377

PII: S1084-208X(07)00005-5

doi: 10.1053/j.trap.2007.02.004

Techniques in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Management
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 33-41 , January 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution